LGCmain
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 2844
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2001  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 413-4

Evaluation of an indigenously manufactured rapid immunochromatographic test for detection of HBsAg.


Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore

Correspondence Address:
A A Raj
Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 12035352

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

A 'rapid' one step immunochromatographic, visually read, antigen capture assay--the "HEPACARD" (J Mitra & Co. Ltd., New Delhi, India) used for rapid screening of HBsAg was evaluated. Thousand consecutive sera sent to our laboratory for the purpose of HBsAg screening were tested by this device and by a third generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Auszyme Monoclonal, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois) or an automated Axsym microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) (Axsym HBsAg V2, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Chicago, Illinois, ISA). Hepacard showed a sensitivity of 79% (CU: 57.3-92%) and specificity of 98.9% (CI: 97.9-99.4%) when compared to the findings by the third generation EIA assays. This study suggested that this particular rapid HBsAg test results have to be confirmed by either an EIA or MEIA where the facility exists. The test may be used only in a small hospital setting where the facilities for enzyme immuno assays do not exist.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed510    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded139    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal