|
Year : 2009 | Volume
: 52
| Issue : 2 | Page : 242-243 |
|
Cutaneous angiomyolipoma |
|
Kulwant Singh1, Radha Ramachandra Pai1, Hema Kini1, Ullal Anand Kini2
1 Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India 2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|
|
 |
|
Abstract | | |
Cutaneous angiomyolipomas are rare. We report a case in a 45-year-old male with a well circumscribed lesion located on the chin. This lesion, probably hamartomatous in nature, differs from renal angiomyolipoma in terms of nonassociation with tuberous sclerosis, circumscription, and male predominance. Another characteristic feature is the absence of epithelioid cells. Differential diagnosis includes angiolipoma, angioleiomyoma, hemangioma, and myolipoma. It is distinguished from the abovementioned entities by the presence of a combination of thick-walled blood vessels, smooth muscle, and fat. Keywords: Angiomyolipoma, hamartoma, skin
How to cite this article: Singh K, Pai RR, Kini H, Kini UA. Cutaneous angiomyolipoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2009;52:242-3 |
Introduction | |  |
Angiomyolipomas are uncommon lesions that are seen most often in the kidney but have also been described at many other sites including the skin. Angiomyolipomas belong to the family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors and are characteristically positive for HMB-45. [1] Cutaneous angiomyolipoma is a very rare benign vascular tumor that consist of convoluted thick-walled blood vessels, adipose tissue and smooth muscle bundles. [2] It differs from renal angiomyolipoma in terms of sex predominance, clinical association, circumscription and HMB-45 immunoreactivity. [3]
Case Report | |  |
A 45-year-old male presented with a painful nodule on the chin measuring 1 1cm in size. It was nontender with no local increase in temperature. The skin over the nodule was not pinchable and the nodule was firm with well defined borders. The patient had no signs of tuberous sclerosis. The nodule was excised and sent for histopathologic evaluation.
Pathological findings
On gross examination, it was a well circumscribed nodule measuring 1cm in diameter with a solid white appearance on the cut surface. Histologically, a circumscribed tumor was seen composed of ectatic thick-walled blood vessels lined by plump endothelial cells and surrounded by bundles of smooth muscle cells. Islands of adipose tissue were also seen. Compressed fibro-adipose tissue and blood vessels were seen outside the expanding margin of the tumor [Figure 1]. Based on the admixture of vascular component, smooth muscle bundles and adipose tissue, a diagnosis of angiomyolipoma was made.
Discussion | |  |
Angiomyolipoma is probably a hamartomatous process which is seen mainly in the kidney. It is often seen in patients with tuberous sclerosis. It shows a female predominance and is composed of an admixture of small to medium-sized thick-walled blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and adipose tissue. A population of epithelioid or clear cells may also be seen, arranged around the blood vessels. [3] Angiomyolipomas are rarely seen at many other locations including skin, liver, spleen, lymph node, spermatic cord, penis, vagina, uterus, Fallopian tube More Details, oral cavity, nasal cavity, lung, heart, colon, abdominal wall, retroperitoneum, mediastinum, epidurally in the spine, and subgalea aponeurotica. [3] Cutaneous angiomyolipomas are rare and differ from renal angiomyolipomas in that they are more common in males, 33 to 77 years of age without any association with tuberous sclerosis and are HMB-45 negative. [3] Histologically, they are composed of thick-walled blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and mature fat in variable proportions. Epithelioid cell component is usually absent in cutaneous angiomyolipomas, in contrast to renal angiomyolipomas, which may be responsible for HMB-45 negativity of the former tumour. [3]
Histologic differential diagnosis of cutaneous angiomyolipoma include angiolipoma, angioleiomyoma, hemangioma with partial involution and fatty replacement and myolipoma. [3] Smooth muscle bundles are not seen in angiolipoma, whereas angioleiomyoma lacks an adipose tissue component. Hemangiomas do not show a smooth muscle component. Angiomyolipoma is differentiated from myolipoma by the absence of thick-walled blood vessels in the latter. Cutaneous angiomyolipomas are rare and to the best of our knowledge, twelve cases have been published to date. [3] Our findings in this case correlate with other cases in terms of male predominance, lack of association with tuberous sclerosis and solitary nature of the tumor.
It differs from the other cases of cutaneous angiomyolipomas reported in a series in terms of location. [4] All cutaneous angiomyolipomas presented in the reported series were acral in location, while our case was observed on the chin. The exact relationship to the newly described family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) is unclear in view of the absence of epithelioid/clear cells, and differences in clinical associations. Cutaneous angiomyolipoma is uncommon and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any skin tumor with a combination of blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and adipose tissue.
References | |  |
1. | Ma L, Kowalski D, Javed K, Hui P. Atypical angiomyolipoma of kidney in a patient with tuberous sclerosis: A case report with p53 gene mutation analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:676-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
2. | Argenyi ZB, Piette WW, Goeken JA. Cutaneous angiomyolipoma: A light-microscopic, immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic study. Am J Dermatopathol 1991;13:497-502. [PUBMED] |
3. | Val-Bernal JF, Mira C. Cutaneous angiomyolipoma. J Cutan Pathol 1996;23:364-8. [PUBMED] |
4. | Fitzpatrick JE, Mellete JR Jr, Hwang RJ, Golitz LE, Zaim MT, Clemons D. Cutaneous angiolipoleiomyoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:1093-8. |

Correspondence Address: Kulwant Singh Pathology Department, Kasturba Medical College, P.O. Box 53, Mangalore - 575 001 India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.48932

[Figure 1] |
|
This article has been cited by | 1 |
Cutaneous Angiomyolipoma: A Distinct Entity that Should be Separated from Classic Angiomyolipoma. Complete Review of Existing Cases and Defining Fundamental Features. (Preprint) |
|
| Natalia Gabriela Sanchez, Alfonsina Ávila Romay, Eduwiges Martínez Luna, Alvaro Lezid Padilla Rodríguez | | JMIR Dermatology. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 2 |
Supraclavicular extra-renal angiomyolipoma: a challenging diagnosis |
|
| Amrin Israrahmed, Aviral Gupta, Archna Gupta, Rajanikant R Yadav | | BMJ Case Reports. 2021; 14(11): e247358 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 3 |
Radiologic Misunderstanding of Cutaneous Angiomyolipoma in the Alar Base |
|
| Hyun Ho Han,Jong Yun Choi,Bommie F. Seo,Suk Ho Mun,Jong Won Rhie,Sang Tae Ahn,Deuk Young Oh | | Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2014; 25(4): e343 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 4 |
Angiomyolipoma of the Jejunum Mimicking Metastatic Disease in a Patient with Colonic Adenocarcinoma |
|
| Spyridon Miliaras,Dimosthenis Miliaras | | Surgical Science. 2011; 02(02): 52 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 5 |
Unusual multicentric angiomyolipoma of knee joint and soft tissues of the foot | [Angiomyolipome multicentrique atypique de læarticulation du genou et des parties molles du pied] |
|
| Varshney, M.K., Jain, M., Sud, A., Agarwal, S., Nain, M. | | Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise). 2011; 78(2): 180-183 | | [Pubmed] | | 6 |
Unusual multicentric angiomyolipoma of knee joint and soft tissue foot |
|
| Varshney, M.K., Jain, M., Sud, A., Agarwal, S., Nain, M. | | Joint Bone Spine. 2011; 78(1): 85-87 | | [Pubmed] | | 7 |
Unusual multicentric angiomyolipoma of knee joint and soft tissue foot |
|
| Manish Kumar Varshney,Manjula Jain,Alok Sud,Savita Agarwal,Manupriya Nain | | Joint Bone Spine. 2011; 78(1): 85 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | 8 |
Angiomyolipome multicentrique atypique de l’articulation du genou et des parties molles du pied |
|
| Manish Kumar Varshney,Manjula Jain,Alok Sud,Savita Agarwal,Manupriya Nain | | Revue du Rhumatisme. 2011; 78(2): 180 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 8768 | | Printed | 251 | | Emailed | 3 | | PDF Downloaded | 261 | | Comments | [Add] | | Cited by others | 8 | |
|

|