LGCmain
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 1437
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 597-598
Multiple vessels in the umbilical cord: A report of four cases


Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication4-Mar-2013
 

How to cite this article:
Singh N, Rao S, Sobti P, Khurana N. Multiple vessels in the umbilical cord: A report of four cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012;55:597-8

How to cite this URL:
Singh N, Rao S, Sobti P, Khurana N. Multiple vessels in the umbilical cord: A report of four cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Oct 28];55:597-8. Available from: https://www.ijpmonline.org/text.asp?2012/55/4/597/107846


Sir,

The umbilical cord normally contains three vessels - two umbilical arteries and one umbilical vein (UV). Abnormalities leading to multiple vessels in the cord are rare with majority of the reported cases in literature highlighting four vessels due to a persistent right UV. [1],[2],[3] There are only occasional reports mentioning the presence of five vessels in the cord. [3] Out of the 432 placentas examined in our laboratory over a period of 2 years (2009-2011), 4 (0.93%) showed the presence of more than three vessels on cross section of the umbilical cord [Table 1]. We found three cases with five vessels in the cord and one case with four vessels [Figure 1]. In all the four cases, the diagnosis of multiple vessels in the cord was made postnatally on gross examination, and was confirmed by histopathologic examination. The details of the cases are enumerated in [Table 1]. One out of the four cases in the present study showed the presence of five vessels running along the central portion of the cord, while the maternal and fetal ends showed only three vessels; branching of the vessels could be a possible explanation for this finding.
Figure 1: Whole mount view of cut section of the umbilical cord revealing the presence of five blood vessels in (a) and four blood vessels in (b)

Click here to view
Table 1: Clinical details of four cases with multiple vessels in the cord

Click here to view


The umbilical cord is an important vascular appendage which plays a key role in fetal well-being and development. The prenatal as well as postnatal examination of the placenta has contributed significantly to the current knowledge of umbilical cord anomalies and their impact on fetal outcome. Examination of the cord for the number of vessels is a standard part of routine prenatal ultrasonography (USG). Current guidelines emphasize on the utility of gross examination of the placenta for determining the number of vessels. [4] Thus, a careful gross examination and proper sectioning of umbilical cord is extremely important.

The most common cause of four vessels in the cord is a persistent right UV, which normally involutes at 6 th -7 th week of intrauterine life. This condition is often associated with congenital malformations (in around 18% cases) like duodenal atresia, imperforate anus, bowel malrotation, annular pancreas, atrial septal defect, and situs inversus. [1],[2],[3] There are many reports describing the presence of four vessels, and their possible mechanisms have been discussed in detail. [1],[2],[3],[5] However, literature regarding significance of five vessels in the umbilical cord is sparse.

The association of five-vessel cord with congenital anomalies is not clearly understood due to the scarcity of literature pertaining to this condition. However, five or more vessels in the cord have mostly been described as a part of conjoined twinning. [5] Out of the three cases of five-vessel cord encountered by us, only one had an unfavorable clinical outcome in the form of anencephaly. The other two patients delivered twins with no evidence of any congenital malformations. None of our cases had conjoined twinning.

To summarize, simple tests like USG examination of placenta and color Doppler are valuable for prenatal diagnosis, which can alert the radiologist to look for congenital malformation and twinning. However, a simple gross examination of the cord postnatally for the number of blood vessels provides a valuable clue for a thorough examination of the neonate to look for subtle anomalies. Five vessels in the cord are frequently associated with twinning, not necessarily of conjoined type only, and do not always herald an adverse perinatal outcome.

 
   References Top

1.Shen O, Tadmor OP, Yagel S. Prenatal diagnosis of persistent right umbilical vein. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8:31-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Pérez-Cosio C, Sheiner E, Abramowicz JS. Four-vessel umbilical cord: Not always a dire prognosis. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27:1389-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Schimmel MS, Eidelman AI. Supernumerary umbilical vein resulting in a four-vessel umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol 1998; 15:299-301.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Sepulveda W. Time for a more detailed prenatal examination of the umbilical cord? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13:157-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Meyer WW, Lind J, Moinian M. An accessory fourth vessel of the umbilical cord. A preliminary study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 105:1063-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Seema Rao
Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi - 110 002
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.107846

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9040    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded96    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal